Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Callahan v. Jones

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 18, 1939No. 27300. Department TwoPublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeals, J.

The defendants in this action, DeWitt Jones and Eugene G. Cushing, at all times herein mentioned were attorneys at law and copartners, engaged in the general practice under the firm name of Cushing & Jones, in the city of Vancouver, Washington. Since January 1, 1935, Mr. Cushing has been the regularly elected, qualified, and acting prosecuting attorney for Clark county, and Mr. Jones has been his regularly appointed deputy.

The plaintiff herein, William Callahan, for some time prior to May 1936, lived in a trailer, which was standing on property owned by a railroad company, in the city of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Cheney v. UnroeIndiana Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Waymire v. PowellIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Carter v. Bradley County Road Improvement Districts 1 & 2Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1923
  4. Sapp v. DavidsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1933
  5. Snyder v. Tribune Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1913

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Sinclair v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1976
  2. George v. Coolidge Bank and Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1971
  3. State v. RiceWashington Supreme Court · 2012
  4. State v. Detroit MotorsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1960
  5. State v. HambrickWyoming Supreme Court · 1948

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API