Legal Opinion
Carl R. v. State
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided August 30, 1994No. 83267PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HANSEN, Presiding Judge:
Appellant Carl R. (Father) seeks review of the trial court’s order finding C.A.R., S.A.R., P.A.R. and C.A.R. (Children) were deprived children, making them wards of the court and continuing them in the legal custody of the Department of Human Services (DHS).
On May 27, 1993, Appellee State of Oklahoma (State) filed a Petition, in accordance with 10 O.S.Supp.1992 § 1103, alleging Children were deprived as defined by 10 O.S.Supp.1992 § 1101. The Petition further made general allegations in statutory language regarding both parents; and made specific allegations…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Kirschstein v. HaynesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990
- Bane v. Anderson, Bryant & Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
- Gaines v. Sun Refinery and MarketingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990
- Batts v. CarterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1957
- Matter of CPNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1985
3Cited by7 opinions
- In Re Oklahoma Uniform Jury Instructions for Juvenile CasesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2005
- In Re JLMSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2005
- McGuffin v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2005
- L.C. v. StateCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1998
- Matter of CARCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1994
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.