Legal Opinion

State v. Perry

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided February 6, 1973No. 148-71PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

By motion before trial, the respondent in this case asked for a judicial review of the prosecutor’s decision that probable cause for prosecution existed. This motion was denied, and no hearing given on that issue. Meanwhile, unable to raise bail, the respondent was held in custody seven months pending trial.

The state justifies the denial of a hearing on the basis of this Court’s several holdings that it is constitutionally proper to issue an arrest warrant over the oath of a state’s attorney. See, e.g., In re Mahoney, 128 Vt. 462, 464-65, 266 A.2d 444 (1970). As we view the matter this case…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Swenson v. StidhamSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. State v. StewartSupreme Court of Vermont · 1971
  3. In Re MorrisSupreme Court of Vermont · 1967
  4. In Re MahoneySupreme Court of Vermont · 1970

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. William Mayer v. Julius MoeykensCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
  2. State v. NortonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1986
  3. State v. KellySupreme Court of Vermont · 1973
  4. State v. BlaineSupreme Court of Vermont · 1975
  5. State v. PerrySupreme Court of Vermont · 1973

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API