Legal Opinion

State v. Stewart

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided February 9, 1971No. 102-69PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarney, J.

After a search of the premises where the respondent lived, he was charged with the offense of possession of a regulated drug called Demerol, with intent to sell the same, in violation of 18 V.S.A. § 4224(d). The respondent’s 'motion to suppress was denied, and he went to trial. He was found guilty and brings this appeal, asserting fatal defects in the search warrant proceedings, and a factual shortage in the proof of guilt so gross as to require the invalidation of the conviction.

A warrant was issued authorizing a search for regulated drugs at the residence of the respondent, giving the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  5. Bumper v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Gonzales v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
  2. State v. WoodSupreme Court of Vermont · 1987
  3. State v. HoweSupreme Court of Vermont · 1978
  4. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Forrest GORMAN, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
  5. State v. RocheleauSupreme Court of Vermont · 1973

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API