Swenson v. Stidham
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice White
This case has a long and tortured history and is not yet concluded. At this juncture the question is whether, absent further state court proceedings to determine the voluntariness of his confession, respondent’s 1955 conviction for murder is vulnerable to attack under the Fourteenth Amendment as construed and applied in Jackson v. Denno, 378 U. S. 368 (1964).
In July 1955, respondent Stidham was convicted of first-degree murder of a fellow inmate during a riot. He was sentenced to life imprisonment. He was represented by experienced counsel who challenged his confession when it was offered at…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Jackson v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Sigler v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- State v. StidhamSupreme Court of Missouri · 1957
- State v. StidhamSupreme Court of Missouri · 1967
- State v. StidhamSupreme Court of Missouri · 1970
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by57 opinions
- Sumner v. MataSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- People v. LightseyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
- Pete v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1973
- Commonwealth v. BiebighauserSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- State v. BoykinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.