Legal Opinion

State v. McDermott

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided May 15, 1992No. L-91-354PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Abood, Judge.

This is an appeal and a cross-appeal from an order of the Lucas County Court of Common Pleas that permitted attorney John Lawrence to assert the attorney-client privilege and refuse to answer questions about conversations between himself and his former client, defendant-appellee and cross-appellant, Jeffrey McDermott.

Appellant, state of Ohio, sets forth one assignment of error:

“The trial court abused its discretion in finding that the state had not established a waiver of the attorney-client privilege by the defendant.”

McDermott sets forth one assignment of error in support of…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. United States v. United Shoe MacHinery CorporationDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1950
  2. In Re Sealed CaseCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1982
  3. State v. PostOhio Supreme Court · 1987
  4. United States v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1982
  5. In Re Sealed CaseCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1989

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bowne of New York City, Inc. v. AmBase Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1993
  2. State v. OrwickOhio Court of Appeals · 2003
  3. State v. McDermottOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Brackett v. Moler Raceway Park, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2013
  5. People v. Vespucci, New York County Courts2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API