Legal Opinion

Mosley v. Johnson

Utah Supreme Court

Decided April 3, 1969No. 11073PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ELLETT, Justice:

The appellant as plaintiff below sued to recover for the balance due him on a contract to drill a well for the respondents. His action was in two counts: (a) for the contract price; (b) for the reasonable value of the work done. The respondents, who were defendants below, defended on the ground that plaintiff was not licensed to drill wells as required by Sec. 73-3-25, U.C.A.1953, which provides:

Every person, * * * drilling a well or wells in the state of Utah shall, before the first day of May, 1937, and thereafter annually, make application to the-state engineer for a permit…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Comet Theatre Enterprises, Inc. v. CartwrightCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1952
  2. Olsen v. ReeseUtah Supreme Court · 1948

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Citaramanis v. HallowellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1992
  2. State v. FedorowiczUtah Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Lignell v. BergUtah Supreme Court · 1979
  4. State v. HolmUtah Supreme Court · 2006
  5. State v. AraveUtah Supreme Court · 2011

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API