Legal Opinion

Dunn v. Charleston Coca-Cola Bottling Co.

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided March 25, 1992No. 1786PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Shaw, Judge:

Respondent, Albert B. Dunn, instituted this products liability action against appellants, Charleston Coca-Cola Bottling Company and Sunbelt Coca-Cola Bottling Company, Inc., hereinafter Coke, alleging he sustained injuries after drinking a contaminated coca-cola. Coke appeals from a $165,000 jury verdict for Dunn. We affirm.

There are four issues before us on appeal: (1) whether the trial judge erred in asking the jury panel if they would be inclined to limit money damages in order to reduce insurance rates; (2) whether the trial judge erred in allowing Mr. Dunn to call a witness…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Tucker Ex Rel. Tucker v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1977
  2. Reed v. ClarkSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1982
  3. State v. MatthewsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1986
  4. Jackson v. H. & S. Oil Company, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1975
  5. Merritt v. GrantCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1985

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Arthur v. Sexton Dental Clinic Ex Rel. EagertonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2006
  2. Paschal v. CauseyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1992
  3. Dunn v. Charleston Coca-Cola Bottling Co.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API