Dunn v. Charleston Coca-Cola Bottling Co.
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Shaw, Judge:
Respondent, Albert B. Dunn, instituted this products liability action against appellants, Charleston Coca-Cola Bottling Company and Sunbelt Coca-Cola Bottling Company, Inc., hereinafter Coke, alleging he sustained injuries after drinking a contaminated coca-cola. Coke appeals from a $165,000 jury verdict for Dunn. We affirm.
There are four issues before us on appeal: (1) whether the trial judge erred in asking the jury panel if they would be inclined to limit money damages in order to reduce insurance rates; (2) whether the trial judge erred in allowing Mr. Dunn to call a witness…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Tucker Ex Rel. Tucker v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1977
- Reed v. ClarkSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1982
- State v. MatthewsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1986
- Jackson v. H. & S. Oil Company, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1975
- Merritt v. GrantCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1985
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Arthur v. Sexton Dental Clinic Ex Rel. EagertonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2006
- Paschal v. CauseyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1992
- Dunn v. Charleston Coca-Cola Bottling Co.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1992