Legal Opinion
Reed v. Clark
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided January 20, 1982No. 21632PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Littlejohn, Justice:
Plaintiffs Mark Albert Reed and Mabel Reed, husband and wife, filed separate negligence actions for damages incurred when their vehicle collided on the highway with at least one horse which had escaped from a nearby pasture owned by defendant Jocelyn Clark. Husband’s action for loss of consortium and wife’s action for personal injuries were consolidated for trial. Defendant appeals the jury verdict awarding actual damages to Husband, and both actual and punitive damages to Wife.
The incident occurred about 3:00 on the morning of August 15, 1970, on old U. S. Highway 17…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- JKT Co., Inc. v. HardwickSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1980
- Thomas-McCain, Inc. v. SiterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1977
- Laney Ex Rel. Estate of Laney v. HefleySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1974
- Jackson v. H. & S. Oil Company, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1975
- Martin v. DunlapSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1976
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Hook Ex Rel. Estate of Summers v. RothsteinCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
- Samples v. MitchellCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1997
- Saucedo Ex Rel. Sinaloa v. Salvation ArmyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2001
- Lollar v. PoeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1993
- Moran v. JonesCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.