Arthur v. Sexton Dental Clinic Ex Rel. Eagerton
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
BEATTY, J.:
In this medical malpractice action, Ellis Arthur and Barbara Arthur (Appellants) appeal the circuit court’s order, arguing the court erred in: (1) failing to set aside a scheduling order; (2) limiting discovery; (3) denying their Batson motion; and (4) excluding certain witnesses at trial. We affirm.
FACTS
On May 8 1995, Ellis Arthur visited the Sexton Dental Clinic with a toothache. Dr. Sojourner examined Arthur and extracted Arthur’s tooth. Arthur returned to the Sexton Dental Clinic on May 10, 1995, because he continued to experience pain. Dr. Hester examined Arthur, did not see…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Clark v. CantrellSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
- First Savings Bank v. McLeanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1994
- State v. AdamsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1996
- Payton v. KearseSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Bryson v. BrysonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2008
- Jenkins v. FewCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2010
- Burke v. Republic Parking System, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2017
- James v. SOUTH CAROLINA DEPT. OF TRANSP.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2011
- James v. South Carolina Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2011