Legal Opinion

Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Schepman

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 5, 1908No. 21,230PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Prom Henry Circuit Court; John M. Morris, Judge. Action by George W. Schepman against the Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Company. Prom a judgment on.a verdict for plaintiff for $12,500, defendant appeals. Appealed from Appellate Court under §1394 Burns 1908,’ el. 3, Acts 1901, p. 565, §10.

1Opinion of the CourtHadley, J.

Appellee sued the appellant for the loss of a leg, alleged to have 'been caused by the negligence of the appellant. The complaint is in two paragraphs. It is alleged in the first paragraph that appellant owns and operates a railroad running from Indianaolis through Richmond ; that on February 27, 1904, appellant operated between said points a passenger-train scheduled to leave Indianapolis at 6:50 o ’clock in the evening of each day, and held out to the tmblic that said train was a completely vestibuled train; that at the scheduled time'on said day the defendant started a train of cars from…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania Co. v. MarionIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Laporte Carriage Co. v. SullenderIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Nickey v. SteuderIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
  4. City of Logansport v. KihmIndiana Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Enochs v. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1896

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Indiana Union Traction Co. v. LoveIndiana Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Chicago & Erie Railroad Co. v. WebbIndiana Court of Appeals · 1916
  3. Jourdan v. Town of LagrangeIndiana Court of Appeals · 1914
  4. McBride v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API