Legal Opinion
Naylor v. Minnesota Daily
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided January 20, 1984No. C5-83-39PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TODD, Justice.
Celeste Naylor filed a libel suit against the University of Minnesota student newspaper and other defendants. The suit was dismissed for failure to file notice of claim within 180 days as required by Minn.Stat. § 3.736, subd. 5 (1982). We reverse on the grounds that the failure to file notice is not a jurisdictional prerequisite of the statute.
On March 10, 1980, the student newspaper of the University of Minnesota published a photograph of Celeste Naylor, a 43-year-old woman. The photo bore this caption:
There were quite a few older women * * cruising. This was one of the more…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Nieting v. BlondellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
- Reliance Insurance v. St. Paul Insurance CompaniesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- Kossak v. StallingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Hirth v. Village of Long PrairieSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
3Cited by21 opinions
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center v. LoutzenhiserTexas Supreme Court · 2004
- Motto v. CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC.West Virginia Supreme Court · 2007
- Glassman v. MillerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- LaSociete Generale Immobiliere v. Minneapolis Community Development AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
- Gardner v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1988
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.