Legal Opinion

Gardner v. State

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided November 14, 1988No. 283, September Term, 1988PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILNER, Judge.

This case involves a construction of the State Tort Claims Act, now codified in Md.State Gov’t Code Ann., §§ 12-101— 12-109.

Until 1981, the State jealously guarded its sovereign immunity against liability for tort. The Court of Appeals had repeatedly held that the State could not be sued for the tortious conduct of its agencies, instrumentalities, officials, or employees unless the Legislature (1) authorized such a suit and (2) provided the funds or enabled the agency sued to obtain the funds necessary to satisfy any resulting judgment. See, for example, University of Maryland…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. United States v. KubrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Gregory v. MitchellCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
  3. Anna Mae R. Henderson v. United States of America, Anne Marie Henderson, by Her Guardian Ad Litem, Anna Marie R. Henderson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1986
  4. Best Bearings Co., an Illinois Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1972
  5. Austin v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1979

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Simpson v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1991
  2. Conaway v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1992
  3. Higginbotham v. Public Service CommissionCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2006
  4. Wallace H. Campbell & Co. v. Maryland Commission on Human RelationsCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2011
  5. Grand-Pierre v. Montgomery CountyCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1993

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API