Legal Opinion

Covode v. Principaal

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 17, 1896PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error to Kent; Grove, J. Assumpsit by John A. Covode against Henry Principaal and Daniel E. Corbitt for the breach of a building contract. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.

On the 30th of December, 1893, plaintiff, at the request of the two defendants, became the purchaser of a piece of real estate in the city of Grand Rapids, upon which there were a house and barn ■not fully completed. The defendants undertook and agreed that they would furnish the proper material, and finish and complete the buildings, in accordance with certain specifications, and in a manner to be approved by William Williamson, architect, and have the same com-' pleted within 60 days. The defendants failed to complete the buildings within the time named, or at any date, but from time to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. John Hutchinson Manufacturing Co. v. PinchMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Carnegie, Phipps & Co. v. HoltMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Wagner v. CorkhillNew York Supreme Court · 1862

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Burruss v. HinesSupreme Court of Virginia · 1897
  2. Eaton v. GladwellMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Morgan-National Woodworking Co. v. ClineMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1949
  4. Sward v. NashSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API