Legal Opinion

In Re Estate of Graham

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 16, 1923No. Civ. No. 4221PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCraig, J.

the estate of Sarah J. Graham, deceased, was in process of probate, and within the time allowed by law, the appellants made written objections and contested the distribution of the residue thereof. Upon a hearing of the objections and contest the court denied the same and ordered the distribution of the residue of the estate under the terms of the will. From this order the contestants take this appeal, and especially except to that part of the order distributing the residue under the terms of the will to the trustees of the Big Pine Methodist Episcopal Church.

The second paragraph of the will…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Ellert v. CogswellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Lane v. WalkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Mack's Appeal from ProbateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1898
  4. In re Estate of ComassiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Eliot's Appeal From ProbateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1902

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Estate of HendersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Coffee v. William Marsh Rice UniversityCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1966
  3. Moore v. Trinity Methodist ChurchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  4. Samarkand of Santa Barbara, Inc. v. County of Santa BarbaraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  5. Estate of MooreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API