In Re Norman's Petition
Supreme Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
Southerland, C. J.:
The facts of this case are fully stated in a previous opinion of this Court. See Norman v. State, Del., 177 A. 2d 347. For our present purpose the important facts and the question presented may be put as follows:
Petitioner Norman was convicted of a federal crime in 1956 and is now serving a sentence in a federal prison. In March, 1956 he was indicted in Delaware for robbery and other crimes. He demands a speedy trial, and seeks a writ of habeas ad prosequendum. If the writ is served on the United States Marshal, it will be honored by the Department of Justice, provided that…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Ponzi v. FessendenSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Raine v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1920
- In Re SchechtelSupreme Court of Colorado · 1938
- Application of MeltonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1959
- Lee v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1932
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Richerson v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1967
- Cooper v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1966
- State v. ClarkWyoming Supreme Court · 1964
- Cunningham v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1962
- State v. MorrisSuperior Court of Delaware · 1975
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.