Legal Opinion

In Re Norman's Petition

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided September 27, 1962No. 32PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Southerland, C. J.:

The facts of this case are fully stated in a previous opinion of this Court. See Norman v. State, Del., 177 A. 2d 347. For our present purpose the important facts and the question presented may be put as follows:

Petitioner Norman was convicted of a federal crime in 1956 and is now serving a sentence in a federal prison. In March, 1956 he was indicted in Delaware for robbery and other crimes. He demands a speedy trial, and seeks a writ of habeas ad prosequendum. If the writ is served on the United States Marshal, it will be honored by the Department of Justice, provided that…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Ponzi v. FessendenSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  2. Raine v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1920
  3. In Re SchechtelSupreme Court of Colorado · 1938
  4. Application of MeltonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1959
  5. Lee v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1932

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Richerson v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Cooper v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1966
  3. State v. ClarkWyoming Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Cunningham v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1962
  5. State v. MorrisSuperior Court of Delaware · 1975

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API