Legal Opinion

Lee v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided February 29, 1932PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Kirby, J.,

(after stating the facts). The statute upon which the motion for discharge is-based, § 3132, Crawford & Moses’ Digest, reads as follows:

“If any person indicted for any offense, and- committed to prison, shall not be brought to trial before the end of the second term of the court having jurisdiction of the offense, which shall be held after the finding of such indictment, he shall be discharged so far as relates to the offense for which he was committed, unless the delay shall happen on the application of the prisoner.”

This statute has been construed and applied first in Stewart v.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ponzi v. FessendenSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  2. Rigor v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1905
  3. Ware v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1923
  4. Fulton v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1929

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. In Re SchechtelSupreme Court of Colorado · 1938
  2. Dickey v. Circuit Court, Gadsden County, Quincy, Fla.Supreme Court of Florida · 1967
  3. Pellegrini v. WolfeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1955
  4. Application of MeltonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1959
  5. Kirby v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1960

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API