Legal Opinion

Houston v. Delaware, L. & W. R.

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided July 21, 1921No. 2645PublishedCited by 4 opinions

In Error to the District Court of the United States for the District of New Jersey 5 Charles ‘F. Lynch, Judge. Action by Sarah A. Houston, administratrix of Frank J. Houston, deceased, against the Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad Company. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

DAVÍS, Circuit Judge.

Frank J. Houston, plaintiff's intestate, was a passenger on defendant’s train running from Hoboken to and through Orange, N. J., on April 5, 1917. The station at Orange, at this time, was a stationary one. On each side of the station the defendant was doing extensive construction work. The train was composed of the locomotive, 55 feet long, and 6 coaches, each 60 feet long. The car next to the locomotive in which the deceased was sitting was a combination car, one end of which was used as a baggage car, which was next to the locomotive, and the other end as a smoker. In…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Grand Trunk Railway Co. v. IvesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Erie Railroad v. HiltSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  3. Linn v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1918
  4. Gilbert v. Erie R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1899
  5. City of Chicago v. Le MoyneCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1902

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Renz v. Penn Central Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
  2. Griffin Grocery Co. v. RichardsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1926
  3. Lehigh Valley R. v. StevensonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1927
  4. Renz v. Penn Central Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API