Rowland v. Madden
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the-city and county of San Francisco, and from an order' refusing a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMcFarland, J.
After full argument on rehearing,, we see no reason to depart from the conclusion heretofore reached in this case. Appellant complains that the judgment heretofore rendered by this court rests too-largely upon technical grounds. We are disposed to-look through technical difficulties, and mere questions of pleading and practice, to the real legal merits of a case,, when we can do so without violating well-settled principles; but the rule that the proofs must correspond to the averments is too grave to be totally disregarded. Appellant’s real cause of action, if he has any, lies in the *18alleged…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Lathrop v. BamptonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
3Cited by8 opinions
- Estate of ArmsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Falkner v. HendyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Murray v. JohnsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1912
- Reiter v. RothschildCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Burke v. MaguireCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.