Legal Opinion
2284 CORPORATION v. Shiffrin
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided March 30, 2000No. 3:98CV102 RNCPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING AND ORDER
CHATIGNY, District Judge.
After review and over objection, the Magistrate Judge’s recommended ruling is hereby approved and adopted.
1. The Estoppel Claim
Plaintiffs contend that “the regulation at issue did not simply ‘lie fallow’..., it was affirmatively rejected by the Liquor Commission in 1991.” Pis.’ Objection to Recommended Ruling at 5. However, an agency cannot “reject” a regulation; it can only repeal a regulation in compliance with the provisions of the Uniform Administrative Procedure Act. See Con. Gen.Stat. § 4-168(e). No such repeal has occurred here. Thus, the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Heckler v. Community Health Services of Crawford County, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Empress Casino Joliet Corp. v. GiannouliasIllinois Supreme Court · 2008
- Keepers, Inc. v. City of MilfordDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2013
- Empress Casino Joliet v. GiannouliasIllinois Supreme Court · 2008