Legal Opinion
Dunlap v. Presidential Advisory Commission on Election Integrity
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided June 27, 2018No. Civil Action No. 2017-2361Published
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA MATTHEW DUNLAP, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 17-2361 (CKK) PRESIDENTIAL ADVISORY COMMISSION ON ELECTION INTEGRITY, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION (June 27, 2018) On December 22, 2017, the Court held that Plaintiff Matthew Dunlap was entitled to certain documents to vindicate his right, as an appointed commissioner, to fully participate in the proceedings of the Defendant Presidential Advisory Commission on Election Integrity (the “Commission”). See Dunlap v. Presidential Advisory Comm’n on Election Integrity,
286 F. Supp. 3d 96
2Cases cited58 opinions
- Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Landis v. North American Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Griggs v. Provident Consumer Discount Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Crawford-El v. BrittonSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Clinton v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.