Legal Opinion

Dimaio v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Virginia

Decided November 15, 2005No. 2851042PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FITZPATRICK, Judge.

Jeremy Dion DiMaio (appellant) was found guilty in a bench trial of computer fraud, computer trespass, embezzlement and attempted extortion in violation of Code §§ 18.2-152.3, 18.2-152.4, 1 18.2-111, and 18.2-59, respectively. Appellant argues that the evidence was insufficient to prove: (1) the value of the computer records, (2) the value of the non-compete agreements, (3) that he attempted to commit extortion and (4) that he possessed the requisite criminal intent for each charged offense. We hold that the evidence was sufficient and affirm the decision of the trial court.

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Sandoval v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1995
  2. Riner v. Com.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2004
  3. Crowder v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2003
  4. Wright v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1954
  5. Johnson v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1968

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Baylor v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2009
  2. Holcomb v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2011
  3. Wise v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2007
  4. DiMaio v. Com.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2006
  5. Little v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2012

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API