Baylor v. Commonwealth
Court of Appeals of Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
HUMPHREYS, Judge.
Troy Douglas Baylor (“Baylor”) appeals his five convictions for grand larceny, in violation of Code § 18.2-95. On appeal, Baylor contends that the Commonwealth failed to put forth sufficient evidence to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the value of the stolen items exceeded the statutory threshold for grand larceny. For the following reasons, we agree with Baylor and reverse his convictions.
I. Background
“Where the issue is whether the evidence is sufficient, we view the evidence in the light most favorable to the Commonwealth, granting to it all reasonable inferences…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Sandoval v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1995
- Davis v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2002
- Wactor v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2002
- Britt v. Com.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2008
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Brown v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2010
- Jack Randall Young v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2019
- Levin Grimes v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2013
- William James Bowers, Jr. v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2012
- Wells v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2012
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.