Legal Opinion
Mercator Corp. v. Windhorst
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided February 10, 2016No. 15-cv-02970 (JGK)PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
JOHN G. KOELTL, District Judge:
The plaintiff, the Mercator Corporation (“Mercator”), sued Lars Windhorst and Sapinda Holding B.V. (“Sapinda Holding”) for breach of contract. The defendants now move to dismiss the Amended Complaint on the grounds that the plaintiff failed to sue the proper parties, that the claim is barred by the statute of frauds, and that the Court lacks personal jurisdiction over the defendants. For the reasons explained below, the Amended Complaint is dismissed without prejudice.
I
The defendants move to dismiss the plaintiffs Amended Complaint pursuant to…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Chambers v. Time Warner, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- McCarthy v. Dun & Bradstreet Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
- Metropolitan Life Insurance Company v. Robertson-Ceco Corp., United Dominion Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Foros Advisors LLC v. Digital Globe, Inc.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
- Pers. Beasties Grp. LLC v. Nike, Inc.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
- Wolstenholme v. HirstDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2017
- In re Soundview Elite Ltd.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2018
- Hearst Communications, Inc. v. Rugs America Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2025
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.