Legal Opinion

Lefkowitz v. Great Minneapolis Surplus Store, Inc.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 20, 1957No. 37,220PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Murphy, Justice.

This is an appeal from an order of the Municipal Court of Minneapolis denying the motion of the defendant for amended findings of fact, or, in the alternative, for a new trial. The order for judgment awarded the plaintiff the sum of $138.50 as damages for breach of contract.

This case grows out of the alleged refusal of the defendant to sell to the plaintiff a certain fur piece which it had offered for sale in a newspaper advertisement. It appears from the record that on April 6, 1956, the defendant published the following advertisement in a Minneapolis newspaper:

“Saturday 9 a.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Schenectady Stove Co. v. . HolbrookNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
  2. Montgomery Ward & Co. v. JohnsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
  3. Johnson v. Capital City Ford CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1955
  4. Mooney v. Daily News Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1911
  5. Seymour v. Armstrong & KassebaumSupreme Court of Kansas · 1901

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Steinberg v. Chicago Medical SchoolIllinois Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Donovan v. RRL Corp.California Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Zanakis-Pico v. Cutter Dodge, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Grover v. Commonwealth Plaza Condominium Ass'nAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979
  5. Chang v. First Colonial Savings BankSupreme Court of Virginia · 1991

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API