Legal Opinion

Cline v. Rabson

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided July 26, 1993No. 91CA0844Published

1Opinion

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING

Judge DAVIDSON,

dissenting in part from the denial of petition for rehearing.

I would grant the petition for rehearing on Part I. I continue to agree, however, with the views expressed in Part II of that opinion.

I disagree with the holding that, when a public entity raises the issue of sovereign immunity in accordance with § 24-10-108, C.R.S. (1988 Repl.Vol. 10A), the trial court is precluded from taking evidence and adopting findings of fact. To the contrary, it is my opinion that in such circumstance the court is required to do so.

*6This conclusion is premised on the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Mortensen v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
  2. Joseph Osborn and Pamela Osborn, Individually and as Father and Mother and Guardians Ad Litem of Shawna Osborn v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
  3. Gould, Inc., (86-3649), Plaintiff-Respondent, (86-8327) v. Pechiney Ugine Kuhlmann and Trefimetaux, (86-3649), Defendants-Petitioners, (86-8327)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
  4. Paine, Webber, Jackson & Curtis, Inc. v. AdamsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1986
  5. Mt. Emmons Mining Co. v. Town of Crested ButteSupreme Court of Colorado · 1984

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API