Legal Opinion

People v. Corder

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 1, 1928No. Docket No. 120, Calendar No. 33,593PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The conviction should be set aside and a new trial ordered.

The court was in error in permitting Dr. Hubbard to testify to the statement made to him by the little girl, when brought to his office by her mother, several days after the alleged offense. Such repetition of the accusation, previously made to the mother, was improper and should not have been permitted to serve as corroborative of the statements made by the girl in court. That such purpose was permitted appears from the following instruction to the jury:

"The testimony that Dr. Hubbard gave here likewise is merely corroborative. The…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Union Pacific Railway Co. v. BotsfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. State v. HeightSupreme Court of Iowa · 1902
  3. People v. GageMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  4. People v. HicksMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
  5. State v. NewcombSupreme Court of Missouri · 1909

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Lebel v. SwincickiMichigan Supreme Court · 1958
  2. People v. BakerMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
  3. State v. AlexanderSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1951
  4. People v. One 1941 Mercury Sedan, Engine No. 302286California Court of Appeal · 1946
  5. Bednarik v. BednarikNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1940

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API