Legal Opinion

Sears v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided April 16, 1958No. 61834; protest 285929-K (Los Angeles)Published

1Opinion of the Court

Ford, Judge:

The suit listed above challenges the action of the collector of customs in classifying certain imported merchandise as manufactures in chief value of rayon or other synthetic textile, not specially provided for, and levying duty thereon at the rate of 25 cents per pound, plus 35 per centum ad valorem, under paragraph 1312 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by T. D. 51802 and the Torquay Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, 86 Treas. Dec. 121, T. D. 52739.

Plaintiff claims said merchandise to be properly dutiable at the rate of 20 per centum ad valorem under…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Brown v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915
  2. United States v. China & Japan Trading Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1896
  3. Klipstein v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913
  4. Sheldon v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913
  5. China & Japan Trading Co. v. United StatesU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1895

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API