Legal Opinion

Vescio v. Pennsylvania Electric Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 29, 1939No. Appeal, 333PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Maxey,

Plaintiff brought an action in trespass against defendant for the death of her son, Michael Vescio.

Defendant produces and distributes electric current for light and power, and as part of its business maintains and operates a transforming sub-station at Warren, Pa. The entire premises of this sub-station are enclosed by a high wire fence, and entrance to the premises is only through a small building. Within the enclosure there are transformers and wires, with structures supporting them.

On the morning of November 8, 1936, P. J. Crowley, defendant’s employee, was in…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Callihan v. MontgomerySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  2. Commonwealth v. FugmannSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  3. Gaydos v. DomabylSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  4. Shafer v. Lacock, Hawthorn & Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895
  5. Sgattone v. Mulholland & Gotwals, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Murray v. Philadelphia Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  2. Grant v. GAF Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  3. James M. Walker v. United States Gypsum Company, and Third-Party and Coley & Peterson, Incorporated, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1959
  4. City of Erie v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  5. Daniels v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2000

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API