Legal Opinion

Abercrombie v. Hayden Corp.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 18, 1993No. 9007-04517; CA A71590PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeits, J.

In this action for breach of a real estate sales contract, defendant seller appeals from the judgment for plaintiff buyers.1 We affirm.

The parties entered into the contract in August, 1989. There was a specified closing date in the contract and a provision that that date could be extended in writing. A memorandum of the contract was recorded. Plaintiffs delivered the earnest money and quitclaim deeds to an escrow agent, together with the parties’ instructions that, if the transaction failed to close by the specified time, the earnest money was to be delivered to defendant and the quitclaim…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Whinston v. Kaiser Foundation HospitalOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  2. State v. CoffeyOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Allen v. AllenOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Davidson v. WyattOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Howell v. Oregonian Publishing Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Abercrombie v. Hayden Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Mitchell v. Pacific First BankCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  3. Mitchell v. Pacific First BankCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  4. Mitchell v. Pacific First BankCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  5. State ex rel. Abercrombie v. JohnsonOregon Supreme Court · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API