Legal Opinion

Mitchell v. Pacific First Bank

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 7, 1994No. 90C-11087; CA A77581Published

1Opinion of the Court

880 P.2d 490 (1994)

130 Or. App. 65

Leo MITCHELL and Margaret Mitchell, Appellants-Cross-Respondents,

v.

PACIFIC FIRST BANK, a Federal Savings Bank, Respondent-Cross-Appellant.

90C-11087; CA A77581.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Argued and Submitted November 29, 1993.

Decided September 7, 1994.

W. Wallace Ogdahl, Salem, argued the cause for appellants-cross-respondents. On the briefs were Kim E. Hoyt and Ferder, Ogdahl, Brandt & Casebeer.

Harold D. Gillis, Eugene, argued the cause and filed the briefs for respondent-cross-appellant.

Before DEITS, P.J., and RIGGS and LEESON,[*] JJ.

DEITS, Presiding Judge.

Pla…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Mattiza v. FosterOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  2. State v. TuckerOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Moore v. Mutual of Enumclaw InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  4. J.R. Hale Contracting Co. v. United New Mexico BankNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Stinemeyer v. Wesco Farms, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1971

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API