Legal Opinion

Committee on Professional Ethics & Conduct of the Iowa State Bar Ass'n v. Jackson

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided November 25, 1992No. 92-774PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McGIVERIN, Chief Justice.

In this attorney discipline proceeding involving respondent attorney Stephen B. Jackson, we review the Grievance Commission’s findings, conclusions and recommendation pursuant to Iowa supreme court rule 118.10.

The Grievance Commission found that respondent Jackson violated several disciplinary rules. The violations stem from Jackson’s drafting of wills for Delia Gro-vert and Gladys Kortson, each of whom left substantial bequests to John Gualtier, another of Jackson’s clients, and from unauthorized receipt of probate attorney fees. The commission recommended a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. ATTORNEY GRIEV. COMM'N OF MARYLAND OF MARYLAND v. OwrutskyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1991
  2. Committee on Professional Ethics & Conduct of the Iowa State Bar Ass'n v. MershonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1982
  3. Committee on Professional Ethics & Conduct of the Iowa State Bar Ass'n v. ConzettSupreme Court of Iowa · 1991
  4. Committee on Professional Ethics & Conduct of the Iowa State Bar Ass'n v. CoddingtonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1985
  5. Committee on Professional Ethics & Conduct of the Iowa State Bar Ass'n v. ZimmermanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1991

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. HoweSupreme Court of Iowa · 2005
  2. Ruden v. JenkSupreme Court of Iowa · 1996
  3. Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. KersenbrockCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2012
  4. Willey v. RileySupreme Court of Iowa · 1995
  5. Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. John Michael CarterSupreme Court of Iowa · 2014

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API