Legal Opinion

Weatherly v. Cloworth Development Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 22, 1917No. 6681PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error from Superior Court, Garfield County ; Dan Huett, Judge. Action by the Oloworth Development Company, a corporation, against E. B. Weatherly, Treasurer ’ and Ex Officio Tax Collector of Garfield County, Okla. There was a judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtHardy, J.

Defendant in error, plaintiff below, brought this action against plaintiff in error, defendant below, to enjoin the collection of certain taxes assessed against plaintiff’s property, which defendant, as county treasurer of Garfield county, was threatening to collect. Demurrer to plaintiff’s petition was overruled, and defendant prosecutes error.

The petition alleges that defendant, as county treasurer and ex officio tax collector, had advertised plaintiff’s property for sale on account of alleged failure to pay certain taxes aganst said property for the year 1912; that none of plaintiff’s…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Mellon Co. v. McCaffertySupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  2. Southern Surety Co. v. WaitsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  3. Southwestern Surety Ins. Co v. DavisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  4. Williams, County Clerk v. Garfield ExchangeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  5. Board of Com'rs of Canadian County v. TinklepaughSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Stanton v. State Tax CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1926
  2. State Ex Rel. Atty. Gen. v. TittmannNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Shideler v. MartinIndiana Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Harris v. ChambersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  5. Cotton v. BlakeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API