Legal Opinion
Kearney v. Jandernoa
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided May 9, 1997No. 97 C 1559PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
KEYS, United States Magistrate Judge.
The discovery dispute before this Court stems from a derivative action currently pending in the United States District Court for the Western District of Michigan, before District Judge Gordon J. Quist, captioned Kearney v. Jandernoa, case number 1:95-CV-823. On or about February 25, 1997, Plaintiff served Anton R. Valukas, an attorney at the Chicago, Illinois law firm of Jenner & Block, with a subpoena duces tecum pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 45(a)(3). The subpoena was issued by the United States District Court…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- In the Matter of Orthopedic Bone Screw Products Liability Litigation (Mdl No. 1014) Thomas J. FlatleyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
- Slye v. Central States, Southeast, Southwest Areas Health & Welfare FundDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1996
- Pactel Personal Communications v. JMB Realty Corp.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1990
3Cited by6 opinions
- In Re: Sealed CaseCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998
- Dreyer v. GACS Inc.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 2001
- WM High Yield v. O'HANLONDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2006
- Hartford Fire Insurance v. Transgroup Express, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2009
- In Re: Sealed CaseCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.