Legal Opinion

Van Tassel v. Patterson

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 23, 1951No. 35,445PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Thomas Gallagher, Justice.

Three actions for damages and personal injuries arising out of an automobile accident which occurred October 10,1947. The cases were consolidated for trial, and at the close of the evidence the court granted defendant’s motion for a directed verdict in each case on the ground that plaintiffs had failed to establish that defendant’s car was involved in the accident. Plaintiffs have appealed from orders denying their separate motions for a new trial.

Defendant concedes that if the evidence establishes that his car was the one involved in the accident the question of his…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Hanson v. Homeland Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
  2. Kundiger v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
  3. Mathews v. Chicago & North Western Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
  4. Lowen v. PatesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
  5. Lundgren v. Union Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1927

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Lovejoy v. Minneapolis-Moline Power Implement Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
  2. Swedeen v. SwedeenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
  3. Whitney v. ButtrickCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  4. Gonzalez v. HoffmanMichigan Court of Appeals · 1969
  5. Schmidt v. BeningaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API