Legal Opinion

Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, United Gas Pipe Line Company, Intervenors

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided July 14, 1992No. 90-1618PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge BUCKLEY.

BUCKLEY, Circuit Judge:

This case concerns an interim rule issued by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission requiring advance notice and disclosure by natural gas pipeline companies of the construction of new facilities or the replacement of existing ones. The Com mission promulgated the interim rule without the notice and opportunity for comment required by the Administrative Procedure Act. It claimed that the rule fell within the “good cause” exception of the Act because (1) it is an interim measure, and (2) it is needed in order to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. American Federation of Government Employees, Afl-Cio v. John R. Block, Secretary of AgricultureCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1981
  3. Mobil Oil Corp. v. Department of EnergyTemporary Emergency Court of Appeals · 1983

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Jifry v. Federal Aviation AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2004
  2. Chamber of Commerce of United States v. Securities & Exchange CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2006
  3. Utility Solid Waste Activities Group v. Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2001
  4. United States v. CainCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
  5. Priests for Life v. United States Department of Health & Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2014

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API