Legal Opinion

Friedman v. Cohen

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 9, 1966No. 14833PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BELL, Chief Justice.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the trial court sustaining what appellee denominates special exceptions which were asserted against appellant’s second amended original petition and dismissing the cause with prejudice.

In the petition it is alleged that Cohen, the appellee, and Friedman, the appellant, entered into an agreement concerning a certain invention known as “production of burnt clay and flexible road base material.” We hereafter refer to the undertaking as “burnt clay project.” Appellant was to have the right, under the agreement, to pay the expenses involved…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kelly v. WrightTexas Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Harold v. Houston Yacht ClubCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1964
  3. Lederman v. CunninghamCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1955
  4. Riley v. GrayCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1955

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Latham v. Mountain States Mutual Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1972
  2. Ragsdale v. RagsdaleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1975
  3. Collins v. GladdenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1971
  4. McFarland v. ReynoldsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1974
  5. International Bank of Commerce v. City of LaredoCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1980

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API