United States v. Sattar
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION & ORDER
KOELTL, District Judge.
Defendant Lynne Stewart moves for a new trial pursuant to Fed. R. Cr. P. 33, or in the alternative, an evidentiary hearing based on alleged juror misconduct by Juror # 82 during the voir dire examination. Defendant Stewart also requests that the Court conduct an inquiry into allegations of extraneous influence on Juror # 39 and complaints by Juror # 39 about the deliberation process. Co-defendants Ahmed Abdel Sattar and Mohammed Yousry join in these applications. For the following reasons, these applications are denied.
I
The relevant facts relating to the…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- McDonough Power Equipment, Inc. v. GreenwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Tanner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- McGinnis v. RoysterSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United States v. Sun Myung Moon and Takeru KamiyamaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- United States v. Carluin SanchezCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- United States v. StewartCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
- Williams v. ArtusDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- United States v. Al BahlulUnited States Court of Military Commission Review · 2011
- LEIBSTEIN v. LaFARGE NORTH AMERICA, INC.District Court, E.D. New York · 2011
- United States v. McDonaldDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2011
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.