Legal Opinion

United States v. Sattar

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided October 24, 2005No. S1 02 Cr. 395(JGK)PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION & ORDER

KOELTL, District Judge.

Defendant Lynne Stewart moves for a new trial pursuant to Fed. R. Cr. P. 33, or in the alternative, an evidentiary hearing based on alleged juror misconduct by Juror # 82 during the voir dire examination. Defendant Stewart also requests that the Court conduct an inquiry into allegations of extraneous influence on Juror # 39 and complaints by Juror # 39 about the deliberation process. Co-defendants Ahmed Abdel Sattar and Mohammed Yousry join in these applications. For the following reasons, these applications are denied.

I

The relevant facts relating to the…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. McDonough Power Equipment, Inc. v. GreenwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Tanner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. McGinnis v. RoysterSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. United States v. Sun Myung Moon and Takeru KamiyamaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
  5. United States v. Carluin SanchezCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. United States v. StewartCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
  2. Williams v. ArtusDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2010
  3. United States v. Al BahlulUnited States Court of Military Commission Review · 2011
  4. LEIBSTEIN v. LaFARGE NORTH AMERICA, INC.District Court, E.D. New York · 2011
  5. United States v. McDonaldDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2011

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API