Legal Opinion
Ray v. Ray
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided June 25, 2007No. 26343PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Justice BURNETT:
Don Allyn Ray (Appellant) brought this action to set aside the judgment of the family court pursuant to Rule 60(b), SCRCP. The family court granted Melinda Hodges Ray’s (Respondent) motion to dismiss pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6), SCRCP. We reverse.
*82 FACTUAL/PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
Appellant and Respondent were divorced in 2000. In 2001, the family court issued a decree approving the settlement reached by Appellant and Respondent concerning the equitable division of their marital estate. In 2005, Appellant initiated the instant action, alleging an action for fraud upon the court and…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Hazel-Atlas Glass Co. v. Hartford-Empire Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Martha Ann Brundage Rozier v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- King v. OxfordCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
- Hilton Head Center of South Carolina, Inc. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1987
- E.D.M. v. T.A.M.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1992
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In re the Marriage of Susan Gayle Hutchinson and Robert Gregory Hutchinson, In re the Marriage of Susan Gayle Hutchinson and Robert Gregory Hutchinson v. Upon the Petition of Susan Gayle Hutchinson, And Concerning Robert Gregory HutchinsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 2022
- In re the Marriage of Susan Gayle Hutchinson and Robert Gregory Hutchinson, In re the Marriage of Susan Gayle Hutchinson and Robert Gregory Hutchinson v. Upon the Petition of Susan Gayle Hutchinson, And Concerning Robert Gregory HutchinsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 2022
- Ray v. RaySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2007
- Youngbluth v. YoungbluthSupreme Court of Vermont · 2010
- Youngbluth v. YoungbluthSupreme Court of Vermont · 2010