Youngbluth v. Youngbluth

Johnson, J.,

¶29. concurring. I write separately to emphasize that though the procedural posture of this case dictates the result reached by the majority, a motion under Rule 60(b) may provide a vehicle for relief where a spouse has been intentionally misled during a divorce proceeding as to a veteran’s intentions with *74regard to application for disability benefits. Indeed, the troubling facts of this case — including the timing of the divorce order and husband’s application for disability benefits as well as husband’s testimony during the divorce proceedings that he had “no health problems” —…