Legal Opinion

Speidel v. Bryan

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided January 5, 1996No. Civil No. 94-1577-FRPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FRYE, District Judge:

The matters before the court are:

1. the motion of defendant Patricia Bryan to overturn renewed default (# 36);

2. the motion of defendant Patricia Bryan to change deposition location (# 38);

3. the motion of defendant Paul Bryan to change deposition location (# 39);

4. the request of the plaintiff, Marlys Speidel, for entrance of judgment (# 40);

5. the motion of Patricia Bryan to amend judgment awarding costs and expenses to plaintiffs attorney in the court’s opinion and order of September 19, 1995 (submitted as “motion to overturn judgment”) (# 42);

6. the motion of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Mendoza v. Wight Vineyard ManagementCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  2. Walter E. Heller Western, Inc. v. Seaport Enterprises, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 1983

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Fujimoto v. AuHawaii Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Brown v. Spears (In Re Spears)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Missouri · 2001
  3. Singh v. Wackenhut Corp.District Court, M.D. Louisiana · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API