Legal Opinion
Brown v. Spears (In Re Spears)
United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Missouri
Decided July 31, 2001No. 18-30622PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S RULE 37 MOTION
FRANK W. KOGER, Bankruptcy Judge.
This matter is before the Court on the motion filed by the defendant, Jack Steven Spears, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 37, which is made applicable to this adversary proceeding by Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 7037, seeking sanctions for the failure of the plaintiff, Wayne Brown, to answer interrogatory questions (the “Motion”). By the time the Motion was heard on July 17, 2001, Brown had submitted the past-due answers to counsel for Spears, but Spears pursued his request that the Court…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- League v. Graham (In Re Graham)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia · 1996
- Rothery v. Marshack (In Re Rothery)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- In Re OlsonDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1989
- Blue Grass Steel, Inc. v. Miller Building Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1995
- Fureigh v. Haney (In Re Haney)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1999
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Jefferson Hospital Association, Walter Johnson, David Nixon, and Federal Insurance Company v. Lee Davis, M.D.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2020
- BMO Harris Bank N.A., as Successor to M&I Marshall and Ilsley Bank v. Kelley, in his capacity as the Trustee of BMO Litigation TrustDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2022
- In re: Edgar Abner Reyes ColonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2009
- Kelley v. BMO Harris Bank N.A., as successor to M&I Marshall and IIsley BankDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2022
- Kelley v. BMO Harris Bank N.A., as successor to M&I Marshall and IIsley BankDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2022