Legal Opinion

Mendoza v. Wight Vineyard Management

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 26, 1986No. 84-2587PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Per curiam

This action was brought by three farm workers individually and on behalf of others similarly situated against three vineyard management companies and United Vintners (now Heublein Wines), the owner or lessee of the vineyards involved in this suit. The complaint alleged the vineyard management companies had violated the Migrant and Seasonal Agricultural Worker Protection Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 1801-1872 (1982) by failing to register as “farm labor contractors” as required by section 1811 of the Act, and that Heublein violated Section 1842 of the Act by employing unregistered “farm labor…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. John F. Meehan and Robert W. Fink A/K/A Meehan & Fink v. John Snow and Judy SnowCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
  2. Leon Schwab v. Bullock's Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
  3. Provident Security Life Insurance Company v. John S. GorsuchCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
  4. Worldwide Church of God, Inc. v. CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
  5. Conference of State Bank Supervisors v. C. Todd Conover, Comptroller of the Currency of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Grandbouche v. ClancyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
  2. O'connor v. State Of NevadaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
  3. Ricotta v. State of CaliforniaDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1998
  4. Rodriguez Ex Rel. Rodriguez v. Berrybrook Farms, Inc.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1987
  5. Six (6) Mexican Workers v. Arizona Citrus GrowersDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 1986

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API