Crimi v. Crimi

BRADY, Chief Judge.

The plaintiff husband brought this action seeking to be divorced from the defendant. The trial court ruled in plaintiff’s favor and defendant’s allegations of prejudicial error go to the issue above. 1 We affirm.

Before stating the facts we note the failure of defendant’s brief to comply with the provisions of Civil Rule 84.04(d), V.A. M.R. The provisions of that rule are too well known to require repetition. It is sufficient to state that an allegation of error that “appeals court is not bound by the findings of the trial court in a divorce case” is blatant and obvious…