Legal Opinion
Petretes v. Atlanta Loan & Trust Co.
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided January 13, 1926No. 4723PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRussell, C. J.
(After stating the foregoing facts.)
The action is a joint one against the Atlanta Loan & Trust Company and W. C. Redding. The defendants demurred separately. The bank in its demurrer set up that Redding was not its agent; that it was not bound by any contract that may have been entered into by him. Redding alleged that he could not be sued individually, because he was the alleged agent of the bank. To this extent the claims of the defendants were conflicting. Both, however, joined in the contention that the description of the land in question was insufficient to effect any conveyance of the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Crawford v. VernerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
- Horton v. MurdenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
- King v. BriceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1916
- Tippins v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
- Holley's v. CurryWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1905
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Blumberg v. NathanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
- Stanaland v. StephensCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1948
- National City Bank of Rome v. GrahamCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
- Patterson v. Florida Realty & Finance Corp.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1956
- Haygood v. DuncanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1948
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.