Mendoza v. Essential Quality Construction, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Louisiana
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND REASONS
LANCE M. AFRICK, District Judge.
Before the Court is a motion 1 to dismiss filed by defendant, Harris Builders, L.L.C. (“Harris”), pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiffs have opposed the motion. 2 For the following reasons, Harris’s motion is DENIED.
BACKGROUND
Plaintiffs allege that they have not been paid for work that they performed as employees of Harris, Essential Quality Construction, Inc. (“Essential Quality”), and/or Quang “John” Nguyen (“Nguyen”) on a construction project referred to as the “Oak Villa project.” 3 Plaintiffs allege…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Cuvillier v. TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007
- Baker v. PutnalCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
- Rutherford Food Corp. v. McCombSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Spivey v. RobertsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Luna-Reyes v. RFI Construction, LLCDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2015
- Lang v. DIRECTV, INC.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2011
- Bonilla v. Power Design Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Martin v. Spring Break '83 Production, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2011
- Alyssa Lockhart Waguespack v. Star Dental Partners, LLC, et al.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2026
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.