Legal Opinion
Auerbach v. Corn Exchange Nat. Bank & Trust Co.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided March 8, 1945No. 8640PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GOODRICH, Circuit Judge.
This action, brought to recover the value of certain securities, involves the application of the Pennsylvania deficiency judgment statute. The litigation is in federal court solely because of diversity of citizenship of the litigants. All the legally operative facts occurred in Pennsylvania. Local decisions control so far as applicable. Erie Railroad Co. v. Tompkins, 1938, 304 U.S. 64, 58 S.Ct. 817, 82 L.Ed. 1188, 114 A.L.R. 1487. Both parties moved for summary judgment in the District Court, and the defendant’s motion was granted. The plaintiff appeals. The factual…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Pennsylvania Co., Etc. v. ScottSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
- Hatch v. Security-First National BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Tustin v. Philadelphia & Reading Coal & Iron Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1915
- Bright v. AllanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1902
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Interbusiness Bank v. First Nat. Bank of Mifflin.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2004
- Horbal v. Moxham National BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- Miners Sav. Bank of Pittston, Pa. v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1953
- Marine Midland Bank v. Surfbelt, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
- Marine Midland Bank v. Surfbelt, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.