Marine Midland Bank v. Surfbelt, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BECKER, Circuit Judge.
This diversity action requires us to determine the circumstances under which a guarantor may invoke the protections of Pennsylvania’s Deficiency Judgment Act, 42 Pa. Cons.Stat.Ann. § 8103 (1982) (the “Act”.) Specifically, the question presented is whether a guarantor can successfully invoke the Act where the creditor, after having foreclosed on a mortgage put up by the stockholders of the principal debtor to obtain a delay of the creditor’s action against the principal debtor’s property that secures the loan, fails to follow the Act’s appraisal procedures. We conclude…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Hanna v. PlumerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- MECO REALTY CO. v. BurnsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
- Union Tr. Co., Gdn. v. TutinoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
- National Council of Junior Order of United American Mechanics of United States of North America v. ZytnickSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Interbusiness Bank v. First Nat. Bank of Mifflin.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2004
- Horbal v. Moxham National BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- Valley Trust Co. of Palmyra v. LapitskySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- InterBusiness Bank, N.A. v. First National Bank of MifflintownDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2004
- Brunell v. Federal National Mortgage Ass'n (In Re Brunell)District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1985
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.