Legal Opinion
James Romero v. Guy Peterson Ivan Rael, in Their Individual Capacities, and William C. Schaab Rodey, Dickason, Sloan, Akin & Robb, P.A.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided April 23, 1991No. 89-2261, 89-2277 and 90-2042PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LOGAN, Circuit Judge.
Defendants Guy Peterson and Ivan Rael appeal from orders of the district court determining that they were federal, not tribal, police officers and were not entitled to absolute immunity, because they were sued in their individual capacities. Defendants’ counsel appeals from the district court’s imposition of Fed.R.Civ.P. 11 sanctions. 1
Plaintiff James Romero filed the underlying action seeking damages pursuant to the Fifth Amendment and Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971). Plaintiff alleged…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Nixon v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- City of Chanute v. Williams Natural Gas Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
- City Of Chanute, Kansue, v. Williams Natural Gas CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
- Williams v. Board of County CommissionersNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1998
- Big Sky Network Canada, Ltd. v. Sichuan Provincial GovernmentCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
- Nichi Aki Senjuro v. Dr. MurrayCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.