Legal Opinion

McIntosh v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)

Decided April 19, 1993No. 05-91-01015-CRPublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

KINKEADE, Justice.

We withdraw our opinion of February 5, 1993. This is now the Court’s opinion.

Dana K. McIntosh appeals his conviction for murder. The jury assessed punishment at seventy-five years’ confinement in the penitentiary. In nineteen points of error, McIntosh argues that (1) the trial court committed fundamental error in accelerating the pace of the trial, limiting the examination of witnesses, commenting on the weight of the evidence, failing to instruct the jury on the State’s burden to disprove sudden passion, and including a special issue regarding…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Almanza v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
  3. Matson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
  4. Kelly v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
  5. Turner v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Hill v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
  2. Armstrong v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1997
  3. Kelley v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)1998
  4. Moore v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1995
  5. Puente v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1994

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API